Crime and Punishment

Summary

Raskolnikov, months out of the university and deep in debt, lives in a coffin-like room and barely speaks to anyone. He has been turning over a plan. After a rehearsal visit to the pawnbroker Alyona Ivanovna and a chance meeting with the drunken clerk Marmeladov — whose daughter Sonia has gone into prostitution to feed the family — he learns Alyona will be alone at a set hour. He takes an axe, kills her, and is then surprised by her gentle half-sister Lizaveta, whom he kills as well. He escapes almost by accident and hides the few things he stole.

He falls into a feverish illness. Summoned to the police over an unpaid debt, he faints when the murder is mentioned. His friend Razumihin looks after him; his mother and sister arrive in Petersburg. He gives away nearly all the money his mother sent, and when Marmeladov is run over in the street he leaves almost his last roubles with the widow, Katerina Ivanovna.

His sister Dounia is engaged to Luzhin, a self-satisfied lawyer who wants a wife who will be grateful to him. Raskolnikov breaks up the match. He meets Porfiry Petrovitch, who has read an article Raskolnikov once published dividing people into the 'ordinary', who must obey the law, and the 'extraordinary', who may step over it if their idea requires it. Porfiry never accuses him; he circles.

Svidrigaïlov — Dounia's former employer, who had pursued her and whose wife has just died — arrives in the city and attaches himself to Raskolnikov. Raskolnikov goes to Sonia, makes her read him the raising of Lazarus from the Gospel, and tells her he will come back and say who killed Lizaveta. In another interview Porfiry presses him hard, then lets a house-painter's false confession interrupt them.

At a memorial dinner for Marmeladov, Luzhin plants a banknote on Sonia and accuses her of theft to revenge himself on Raskolnikov; he is exposed. In the confusion, with Katerina Ivanovna collapsing toward her own death, Raskolnikov confesses the murder to Sonia. She tells him to go to the crossroads, bow down, kiss the earth, and say aloud what he has done.

Porfiry visits and tells Raskolnikov plainly that he knows, but offers him the chance to confess himself and receive a lighter sentence. Svidrigaïlov, having overheard the confession to Sonia, tries to use it to force Dounia; she refuses him, and he lets her go and shoots himself. Raskolnikov says goodbye to his mother and sister, goes to the crossroads as Sonia told him, and then to the police, where he states that he killed the two women.

He is sentenced to eight years in Siberia, and Sonia follows him. For a long time he feels no remorse for the act itself, only that he failed — that he was not, after all, one of the extraordinary men. Near the end, ill in the prison hospital and then back among the other convicts, something shifts: he weeps at Sonia's feet, and the narrator says a new story is beginning, the story of his gradual renewal. The novel closes on that beginning, not on its completion.

Literary context

Dostoevsky (1821–1881) had himself been arrested as a young man for belonging to a discussion circle, subjected to a mock execution, and sent to a Siberian prison camp for four years. He came back with a deep suspicion of abstract theories that promise to improve humanity from above.

Crime and Punishment appeared in the journal The Russian Messenger in 1866, in the years of debate that followed the freeing of the serfs. Utilitarian and rationalist ideas — that conduct could be worked out by calculation, that some suffering might be justified by a greater good — were widely discussed. The novel does not summarise those debates; it drops a character who has half-absorbed them into a hot, crowded city and watches what happens.

It is a long novel with a tight timeframe: the main action covers about two weeks. Dostoevsky wrote it quickly and under financial pressure, and that urgency is on the page.

Raskolnikov's theory of the extraordinary man

Before the murder, Raskolnikov published an article arguing that humanity divides into two kinds. The 'ordinary' majority exist to be governed and must live obediently. A small number of 'extraordinary' people — his examples are lawgivers and founders, with Napoleon as the type — carry a new idea, and if that idea can only be realised by stepping over the old law, they have an inner right to do so. Crime, in this scheme, is almost a duty for the person destined to remove an obstacle.

The novel is not a lecture in favour of this idea; it is a test of it, and Raskolnikov is the test subject. He half-believes the theory and half-uses it as permission. Part of him wants to help — the pawnbroker is presented as a parasite, and the money could save Dounia from marrying Luzhin — and part of him simply wants to know which kind of man he is. Porfiry sees this doubleness at once and keeps returning to the article.

What the murder produces is not confirmation but collapse. The theory has no place for Lizaveta, who was not part of the plan; no place for the horror, the isolation, the fever; no place for the fact that Raskolnikov cannot spend the stolen money or even look at it. The gap the book opens is between an argument that works on paper and a person who has to keep living afterwards. Whether that gap is conscience, cowardice, or something the theory simply left out is one of the questions the novel keeps in play.

Crime, guilt and 'punishment'

The title names two things, and the novel keeps them apart. The legal punishment — arrest, trial, eight years in Siberia — is almost an afterthought; it takes a few pages of the epilogue. The punishment the book is interested in starts the moment the axe falls: the sickness, the compulsion to return to the scene, the need to confess to near-strangers, the sense of being cut off from other people as if by a physical barrier.

It would be too simple to say this suffering proves Raskolnikov is really good. For much of the book he is not sorry he killed; he is tormented that he could not carry it off, that he failed the test he set himself. His suffering is real but it is not yet moral clarity. The novel seems more interested in suffering as something that has to be gone through than as a verdict — and it never quite settles whether what he undergoes is a penalty from outside, the natural result of the act, or the start of a change he could not have chosen directly.

The city as pressure

St Petersburg in the novel is not a backdrop but a force. It is high summer; the streets are airless and stinking, the canals are foul, people are crammed into rented corners of other people's flats. Raskolnikov's room is repeatedly compared to a cupboard or a coffin. Marmeladov drinks in a cellar tavern; Sonia rents a room from strangers; Katerina Ivanovna coughs blood in a passage room; Svidrigaïlov spends his last night in a filthy hotel.

This crowding and humiliation is the water the characters swim in. Debt, pawn tickets, the dread of the landlady, the shame of a threadbare coat — these are constant, and they wear people down. The novel takes that pressure seriously as part of why Raskolnikov's mind goes where it goes.

But the book is careful not to make poverty a machine that manufactures murderers. Razumihin is just as poor and stays generous and sane; Sonia is destitute and does not become cruel. The city supplies the conditions and the strain; it does not supply the theory or the axe. Holding both facts at once — the environment matters, and it does not excuse — is part of reading the novel well.

How the novel is told

Crime and Punishment is narrated in the third person, but the narration keeps unusually close to Raskolnikov — for long stretches the reader is inside his perception, his half-thoughts, his misreadings of a room or a face. This is why the book can feel like a first-person confession even though it is not one. It helps to separate three things while reading: Dostoevsky the author, who arranged the whole design; the narrating voice, which reports and sometimes knows more than Raskolnikov does; and Raskolnikov's own racing mind, which is often unreliable.

The distance matters at the turning points. When Raskolnikov rationalises the murder, the narration lets the reasoning run without stepping in to correct it; the correction comes from events and from other characters. In the epilogue the narrator pulls back and speaks about him almost from the outside, which is part of why the ending reads like a door opening rather than a scene fully played.

Sonia, confession and the epilogue

Sonia Marmeladov is often called the novel's saint, but the text gives her a harder situation than that label allows. She sells herself because her stepmother's children are starving and there is no other income; she carries the yellow pass that marks her legally as a prostitute; she is timid, easily crushed, and holds to her faith because it is what she has. She is not outside the world's degradation — she is deep in it — and her goodness is a set of choices made from there, not a halo.

Her part in the confession is specific. Raskolnikov goes to her because she too has 'stepped over' a line, in her case to keep others alive, and he wants to know whether that makes them the same. She refuses the comparison. She makes him read the raising of Lazarus aloud; later she tells him to go to the crossroads and confess to the earth and the people. She offers to follow him to Siberia before he has admitted anything, and she does.

The epilogue needs to be read carefully. Raskolnikov confesses, is sentenced, and spends most of his prison time still hard, still unconvinced he did wrong. The turn comes late and is barely dramatised: he is ill, he sees Sonia, he finds himself weeping and holding her knees, and the narrator says that here begins 'a new story' — the story of his renewal, which 'might be the subject of a new tale'. The novel ends on a beginning. It does not show a completed conversion; it points at the possibility of one and stops.

The doubles

Dostoevsky surrounds Raskolnikov with figures who each embody a version of a path he could take. Razumihin is the road toward health: poor, warm, practical, in love, getting on with life. Luzhin is the theory made respectable — a man who reasons that self-interest, pursued openly, benefits everyone, and who wants people beholden to him. Porfiry is the intelligence that has thought all of Raskolnikov's thoughts and stayed on the near side of the line.

Svidrigaïlov is the darkest mirror. He also considers himself above ordinary rules and acts on his desires — including toward Dounia — without the torment Raskolnikov feels, and he is haunted anyway. His conduct toward Dounia is coercion and should be read as such; the novel does not present it as seduction. When she refuses him, he lets her go, provides for Sonia and the Marmeladov children, and shoots himself. It reads as one possible end of Raskolnikov's road: a freedom from conscience that turns out to be unlivable. Sonia is the opposite pole — the way through confession rather than around it.

Main characters

Rodion Romanovitch Raskolnikov

A former law student in his early twenties, living in extreme poverty in Petersburg. Proud, clever, increasingly withdrawn, he acts on a theory that a few people are entitled to break the law for a great enough idea, kills the pawnbroker Alyona Ivanovna and her sister Lizaveta, and then cannot live with it. Called Rodya by his family, Rodion Romanovitch formally.

Sofya Semyonovna Marmeladov (Sonia)

Marmeladov's eldest daughter, forced into prostitution to support her stepmother's children. Poor, fearful and devout, she becomes the person Raskolnikov confesses to and follows him to Siberia. The novel treats her faith and her choices as made from inside degradation, not above it.

Dmitri Prokofitch Razumihin

Raskolnikov's one friend from the university — poor, energetic, generous, level-headed. He nurses Raskolnikov through his illness, protects the mother and sister, and eventually marries Dounia. A picture of what poverty need not do to a person.

Avdotya Romanovna Raskolnikov (Dounia)

Raskolnikov's sister. Intelligent and strong-willed; she is prepared to marry Luzhin to secure her brother's future until Raskolnikov and events end the engagement. She faces down Svidrigaïlov's attempt to coerce her and refuses him. Her choices are her own, not merely reactions to her brother.

Porfiry Petrovitch

The examining magistrate investigating the murders. He never formally accuses Raskolnikov; he talks, watches, sets small traps, and urges him to confess for his own sake. A period figure, not a modern profiler — his method is conversation and psychological pressure.

Arkady Ivanovitch Svidrigaïlov

Dounia's former employer, recently widowed under suspicion. He considers himself beyond ordinary morality and pursues Dounia; his conduct toward her is coercion. After she refuses him he releases her, provides for Sonia and the Marmeladov children, and shoots himself.

Pyotr Petrovitch Luzhin

The lawyer engaged to Dounia. Vain and calculating, he wants a wife who will owe everything to him and argues a tidy version of rational self-interest. When Raskolnikov humiliates him, he tries to destroy Sonia with a planted banknote and is exposed.

Semyon Zaharovitch Marmeladov

A drunken former civil servant whose fall has pushed his family into misery. His long confession in the tavern, and his death under a carriage, bring Raskolnikov into contact with Sonia and Katerina Ivanovna.

Katerina Ivanovna

Marmeladov's widow, from a once-genteel family, consumptive and proud. Her fight to keep some dignity as everything collapses — the disastrous memorial dinner, her final breakdown in the street — is one of the novel's studies of humiliation.

Pulcheria Alexandrovna Raskolnikov

Raskolnikov's mother. Devoted to her son, she comes to Petersburg with Dounia; she senses something badly wrong long before she is told, and in the epilogue declines and dies without learning the whole truth.

Alyona Ivanovna

The old pawnbroker Raskolnikov kills. Shown through his eyes as mean and predatory — a view he uses to justify the plan.

Lizaveta Ivanovna

Alyona's meek, downtrodden half-sister, who walks in on the murder and is killed too. She was no part of Raskolnikov's plan, and her death is what the theory has no answer for.

Main themes

Transgression and its consequences

The novel is built around one act of stepping over the law and everything that unspools from it — not mainly the legal consequence, but the psychological and moral one.

Pride and isolation

Raskolnikov's separateness is there before the murder and hardens after it. Much of his suffering is the sense of being walled off from ordinary human contact; much of his slow change is that wall coming down.

Poverty and humiliation

Debt, cramped rooms, pawn tickets, threadbare clothes — the daily grind of being poor in the city is constant, and the novel takes it seriously as strain without making it an excuse.

Suffering and compassion

Against the theory's arithmetic the book sets acts of unearned kindness — Raskolnikov leaving money with the Marmeladovs, Razumihin's loyalty, Sonia following him east — and treats suffering as something to be shared rather than calculated.

Theory versus lived reality

Ideas are tested by being lived out. Luzhin's rational self-interest, Raskolnikov's extraordinary man, Svidrigaïlov's freedom from rules — each looks different once a person is inside it.

Confession and the possibility of renewal

The plot moves toward speaking the act aloud — to Sonia, to the crossroads, to the police — and the epilogue frames that as the start of a change rather than its completion.

Key passages

Questions for reflection

Use these to guide your own reading — there are no ready-made answers.

1. Raskolnikov gives several reasons for the murder at different points — the money, ridding the world of a 'louse', finding out what kind of man he is. Do these add up, or does the novel leave his motive unresolved on purpose?
2. The narration is third person but often sits very close to Raskolnikov's perception. Where does the narrating voice seem to know more than he does, and what does that distance let you see?
3. How does the novel use St Petersburg — its heat, its rooms, its crowds — as part of the story rather than just its setting?
4. Sonia is often called the novel's saint. What does that description capture, and what does it leave out about her situation and her choices?
5. Porfiry could arrest Raskolnikov but does not. Why does he want a confession that comes from Raskolnikov himself?
6. Svidrigaïlov also believes he is above ordinary rules. What does his end suggest about where Raskolnikov's road might have led?
7. The epilogue says a 'new story' is only beginning. Why might Dostoevsky end here instead of showing Raskolnikov changed?

Read and understand

Read Crime and Punishment in full on ReadPro, free and in your browser. The edition is Constance Garnett's 1914 translation, so the English is a little old-fashioned and the Russian names move between first name, patronymic, surname and nickname (Raskolnikov is also Rodion Romanovitch and Rodya; Sonia is Sofya Semyonovna; Dounia is Avdotya Romanovna). When a sentence or an argument gets hard to follow, select the passage in the reader and use Explain for a plain-language explanation, without leaving the text.

Read now

Once you have read and questioned passages here, you can bring the same approach to a file of your own: explain a PDF, EPUB or text file.